Judging the Royals

Kansas City Star

Games » Arizona Diamondbacks

May19

Harder than it looks

Lee Judge

The Kansas City Star

In the first inning Bruce Chen had runners on first and second and nobody out—and didn’t give up a run. In the second inning Bruce Chen had runners on first and third and nobody out—and didn’t give up a run. In the third inning Bruce Chen had two runners on and two outs—and didn’t give up a run. In the fourth inning Bruce Chen had runners on first and second and nobody out—and didn’t give up a run.

A 7-3 win might sound easy if you weren’t there—or didn’t pay attention if you were—but it was like that pretty much all night. The fifth and sixth innings were 1-2-3, but Bruce gave up two runs in the seventh—with a little help from his friends—and the Diamondbacks had the tying run on deck in the eighth.

After the game Ned Yost was asked when he finally felt safe and he said it was when Jeff Francoeur caught a fly ball for the final out of the game.

This one was harder than it looks.

Game notes

Second inning: Jason Kubel doubled to lead off the inning. Paul Goldschmidt singled and Alex Gordon kept Kubel from scoring by charging the ball hard and having a reputation for throwing runners out. Gordon’s play won’t get noticed, but without it, Jarrod Dyson would not have had the opportunity to throw Kubel out at the plate.

Kubel tagged after Jarrod caught Ryan Roberts’ fly ball, but Dyson did a good job of getting behind the ball and coming forward as he made the catch. That gave his throw the momentum it needed. Dyce has taken some criticism for plays he didn’t make, but he did everything right on this one. (And never forget the play a catcher—Brayan Pena in this case—has to make on the other end. Catching the ball and applying the tag on a runner at home plate isn’t as easy as some people think.)

In the bottom of the second Chris Getz drove in the game’s first run with a two-out, two-strike RBI single, scoring Mike Moustakas from second base. Brayan Pena was thrown out attempting to go from first to third, so I asked Ned after the game if Brayan was intentionally drawing the throw to ensure Mike would be safe at home, but Ned said no, Brayan assumed the throw would go home to get Moustakas.

Third inning: Diamondbacks pitcher Ian Kennedy was extremely quick delivering the ball to home plate, at times under 1.2 seconds. That stopped the Royals from running, but it didn’t stop them from trotting: he gave up a home run to Billy Butler and another to Mike Moustakas. In fact, Kennedy gave up six earned runs in four and a third innings.

I know lots of people disagree, but the Royals believe a pitcher who delivers the ball that quickly to home plate pays by throwing more pitches up in the zone. They also believe the pitches have less on them.

Fifth inning: Before the game Eric Hosmer told me he likes the two-hole—more fastballs with Dyson on base in front of him and Butler on-deck behind him. I said being at the top of the order, the extra plate appearance doesn’t hurt either. Hosmer said, “You mean the extra knock.” I’m pretty sure Hosmer doesn’t need to go down to the minors to regain his confidence—he never lost it.

(He hit a line-drive RBI single in the fifth and absolutely crushed a ball—right at the second baseman—in the 6th. The ball was hit so hard it was in the second baseman’s glove before Eric finished his swing.)

Billy Butler found himself in a 3-0 count with Dyson on third and Hosmer on second. At times, Ned Yost likes to give power hitters the green light 3-0 and I figured this would be one of those times. So did Ian Kennedy. He threw a 3-0 change, Billy swung and missed, but Butler came back to hit a sacrifice fly for another RBI.

After Billy’s sac fly, Diamondbacks manager Kirk Gibson brought in left-handed reliever Mike Zagurski. I know next to nothing about the Diamondbacks bullpen, but Zagurski had a 5.40 ERA. And that brings up an important point:

Managers have several strategies for the bullpen in mind, depending on the situation when the starter leaves. They usually have a set of guys they’ll use if they’re ahead and another set of guys they’ll use if they’re behind. Unless your best relievers need work, why waste quality innings on a game you’re likely to lose?

So—even though it drives some fans crazy—a manager might play for one run knowing that if they can grab a lead before the starter leaves the game, they’ll push the other manager into using the weaker part of his pen. I couldn’t say if that’s what happened with Zagurski, but it does happen.

Seventh inning: The Diamondbacks had one run in and another runner on second when Willie Bloomquist came to the plate. Willie singled, and the runner on second base, Ryan Roberts, headed for home. Jeff Francoeur came up throwing, but kept his throw to home low. That allowed Eric Hosmer to decoy Bloomquist by faking a catch of Frenchy’s throw. Bloomquist stayed at first and one pitch later, Aaron Hill grounded into a double play.

The double play was nice, but Francoeur and Hosmer’s good fundamentals made it possible.

BABIP

Batting Average Ball in Play. That term has been thrown around recently while discussing Eric Hosmer. Eric’s BABIP is extremely low and several times people have described BABIP as measuring how “lucky” a hitter is. Hit a lot of balls at people—which Hosmer has done—and your BABIP will suffer.

But luck is only part of it: the harder you hit the ball, the luckier you’ll be. More three-hoppers will get through the infield. But then again, the opposite can also be true: if Jarrod Dyson hits the ball weakly, his foot speed can increase his BABIP. Throw in type of ball in play (grounder, fly ball, line drive), skill level of the defense and whatever other factors I forgot to include and it’s clear BABIP includes more than luck.

Moose on Hos

I asked Mike Moustakas what it mean to him that the Royals didn’t send him down when he struggled in 2011, “Everything.” Mike said it told him he belonged, he was a major-leaguer. I asked when things changed for the better and Moose said when he quit listening to all the critics and doubters. When he finally allowed himself to relax and go out and play the game, Mike’s natural talent took over. Mike thinks that’s exactly what his buddy, Eric Hosmer, needs to do.

Jason Kendall said the same thing: Hosmer needs to quit thinking and play. Jason pointed out that when Hosmer hit .293 in 2011, it wasn’t a fluke. Hosmer did it over most of a season. It wasn’t a September call-up having a hot month. Kendall said, “That kid’s going to be here 20 years.”

Moustakas thinks a trip to the minors wouldn’t help Eric’s confidence, it would hurt it. Looking at Hosmer’s numbers in Triple A, it’s hard to imagine he has anything left to prove down there. Mike makes another good point: “Anybody that’s here every night sees the same thing: He’s squaring up two or three balls a night, but not hitting into any luck.”

Moose is right. If you’ve been here watching Hosmer, it’s hard to disagree.

Ya gotta have a plan

Interleague play is coming and the Royals pitchers are preparing to go to the plate. If it’s at all feasible, the Royals will have them sacrifice bunt. But what if nobody’s on and the bunt isn’t in order?

The Royals pitchers will swing away, and—after listening to several of their game plans—it probably won’t be pretty. One plan is to look really bad on a breaking pitch (shouldn’t be a problem) and then look for it again. Another plan is to do nothing until the pitcher throws something off-speed away and then—as Everett Teaford put it—“filet” the ball the other way.

(Notice how the plans call for hitting an off-speed pitch? They figure those will match their bat speed.)

I suggested standing on top of the plate, hands over the zone, daring the pitcher to come inside. At least you know you’ll be getting a fastball. I don’t think anyone’s buying a strategy that has something in the mid-90s buzzing past within a few inches of their bodies. Although, Teaford—who will be up there left-handed—told me he’d rather face any right-hander, even one throwing in the upper nineties, than any left-hander. He knows that if a lefty throws a breaking pitch at him, his backside will depart the scene of the crime. Teaf knows how much his teammates will enjoy that moment and he’s trying to avoid the ridicule.

Speaking of which, if you get the chance, look into the Royals dugout when one of the pitchers is hitting. His teammates will all be hanging on the top rail, enjoying the moment. Every gruesome detail will be analyzed once the pitcher gets back to the dugout unless something bad happens—like the pitcher getting a hit.

Because they don’t know how to run the bases, either.

P.S. Teaford has come up with an abdominal strain that has him out for a while.

Comments

  1. 12 months ago

    Lee, No one ever suggested that BABIP (BTW its batting average on balls in play) is all luck, but I would like to point out that you contradict yourself. First you say its not all luck, then you quote Moose who says Hos is not hitting into luck and you agree. It would be better if you would stick to talking to mmanagers and players about eye test measures and not try explaining stats which you clearly do not understand.

  2. 12 months ago

    Lee’s explanation was fine. Hosmer and Bautista’s BABIP’s are flukey, which has an element of luck to it, but also Hosmer’s LD% is down below last year, so there is an element of skill to it.

    not try explaining stats which you clearly do not understand.”

    Not a lot of people do get BABIP, actually some who have said that a pitcher has no control after the ball leaves his hand. BIPs have an average of around .300 and a surprising number of folks think any deviation from the number is luck, especially if Bruce Chen is the pitcher or if it is a Royals’ hitter with a high one, like Alex and Sal last year.

    Of course, Gaines, you could clearly explain BABIP to us. Gives us an idea of the differences among LD, GB, and FB, maybe explain that a high BABIP can be influenced by the willingness to sit on pitches and accept Ks and BBs if the batter doesn’t get what he wants.

    you contradict yourself.”

    No.

  3. 12 months ago

    Jim,

    I appreciate the fact that you are a self-appointed apologist, but you need to read what he says again. He does contradict himself in talking about Hosmer. I appreciate that you understand some of the eleents of BABIP, like the rest of us (LD% being a large part of that), but my post was talking about what Lee does well versus what he does not do well. I enjoy this site as I have often said for the insights into the players, coaches and scouts experience of the game, but when Lee delves into stats it is disingenuous. This site is not about stats.

    BTW: No, I could not explain BABIP to a neophyte such as yourself Jim. You would need a much greater understanding of the roots of statistics and how measures are constructed. Your simple understanding is cute, but not the basis for an argument. I enjoy some of your posts also, and I think that you do have a good grasp of statisitics is encouraging. But, I wish that you would stop with apologetics. Lee is a big boy who can probably defend himself.

  4. 12 months ago

    I believe the BABIP conversation was merely to show that some think Hosmer has been “unlucky” this year. Nothing more, nothing less. And it was a quote by Moose, not a statement made by Lee. And the ball Hosmer absolutely crushed at the second baseman last night was an example of not hitting into any luck (for the one AB) because the way he squared it up.

  5. 12 months ago

    Gaines: Much of what I wrote about BABIP comes from personal experience, but I also went to Fangraphs to see what they had to say about it.

    They said pretty much exactly what I said and I’m assuming they have a better grasp of the statistic than either one of us.

    My point was that several times, while talking about Hosmer, BABIP has been described as an indication of how “lucky” a hitter is and that’s an incomplete explanation.

    As I said “luck is only part of it”—but it definitely is a part. Moustakas’ point was that the people who are here watching Hosmer every night see the same thing: he’s hit into a lot of bad luck.

    It’s not the only element that makes up BABIP, but in Hosmer’s case, luck has been a big part. I don’t believe the two statement are contradictory.

    Feel free to diagree.

  6. 12 months ago

    Your simple understanding is cute”

    I’ve been wondering why, if BA is such a flawed statistic, that the cool kids don’t use wABIP or something?

    Tell Scott and the gang “Hey” for me. Always nice of you folks to drop by.

    For our readers, BABIP requires no advanced skills, it is exactly what it claims to be, batting average on balls in play. Lots of factors influence BABIP, but the stat itself is simple and straight forward. Its major use is to suggest why Bruce Chen is a more successful pitcher than so-called advanced metrics can explain or his career averages predict or why Hosmer can’t hit his weight while crushing grounders. It’s a tool, it has uses, and I use it myself.

  7. 12 months ago

    Gaines,

    If scrutinized with a pessimist’s eye, you can read anything into about anything. Your game grows old. It’s clear you don’t appreciate the hard work folks put into this site. Might I suggest you go kick your puppy, taint your kids view of the world, and get on with your life.

  8. 12 months ago

    The main reason I read this column is because I enjoy Lee’s writing and insights. But I also like the fact that the the nasty and gratuitous insults are minimal.

    Please, no cat fights, ladies.

  9. 12 months ago

    I believe that anybody ought to be able to take any position they like, but I also believe that they ought to be polite while doing so.

    We’ve been talking about changing our policy on comments to help maintain an insult-free environment.

    I’ll post more on that soon, but be aware that people that can’t comment without insulting others may soon be unable to comment at all.

  10. 12 months ago

    From what I’ve noticed, the insultors tend not to last too long and are good for comic relief as much as anything. We get a new one about every week and I recognize most of them from elsewhere.

    On a more positive note, how ‘bout Frenchy? He’s a streaky guy and if he gets hot can do some damage. We have five stud bats and three have been a little quiet this year. If just one of them lights up the team can get hot.

    A second positive note, Nate Adcock looked good today, five solid innings and a tough luck loss, but he’s doing his job. Arizona’s starter was tough, hats off to him.

  11. 12 months ago

    Frenchy said he made an adjustment this morning in BP and took it into the game. Looks like a heck of an adjustment.

  12. 12 months ago

    The hit that impressed me was the triple to right. If Frenchy shows that he can drive the outside pitch to the opposite field, that will loosen up fielders and present problems for pitchers. As I recall, that was something Francoeur worked on in the off-season, as did Gordon.

  13. 12 months ago

    How did scouts, GM’s, or managers evaluate players back in the day without all these sabremetrics? It would have been impossible to know how good Hank Aaron, Sandy Koufax, or Roberto Clemente was without knowing all these stats. Just sayin’

Sign in with Facebook to comment.